![]() ![]() Measures the time taken in seconds to load Firefox or Waterfox for the first time after a reboot (cold start).Īs you can see from the results in all 11 tests above, the 32-bit version of Firefox won an impressive 8 of the tests, only losing its number one position in the Kraken and Peacekeeper benchmarks and the cold start time. Similar to the test above apart from 25 tabs are open at once. This test is again quite simple, the homepage is loaded into 5 tabs and then after a few seconds the memory usage of Firefox is recorded. As it consumes extra RAM this process is included in the results. Note: Firefox Nightly is at a disadvantage in these memory tests because it loads an additional plugin-container.exe which rises and falls in memory usage as the number of tabs changes. This memory test is rather simple, Firefox is opened and left at the standard start page, after about 10 seconds to let things settle, the used memory for the Firefox.exe process is read in Task Manager. Each benchmark runs itself at least 5 times which explains why the whole process takes around 15 minutes to complete. This is another testing suite produced by Mozilla and runs a number of its own tests, Sunspider tests and V8 tests. The default Core suite tests many areas including tables, DOM, CSS, canvas, scrolling and Javascript. RoboHornet is a relatively new benchmark test and still in alpha. It should automatically choose your nearest regional server, manually select one if you want a different region. The BrowserMark suite tests a number of areas including browser resize, page load and requests speed, Javascript performance and tests for DOM, CSS and graphics speed. Octane is Google’s own Javascript testing suite which replaces the popular V8 benchmark offering 9 additional tests and 4 more than Octane version 1. Peacekeeper is no longer supported by Futuremark but still works. It tests things like DOM operations, HTML5, text parsing and rendering. The company behind 3DMark and PCMark, Futuremark, developed this benchmarking tool. Kraken was developed by Mozilla themselves but this test adds the time taken to complete each test together and gives a total score in milliseconds, so lower is better. Each test runs itself 3 times and an average score is given. It’s a series of Javascript benchmarks covering a range of workloads and scenarios, including tests from Octane 2 and Sunspider. The JetStream test is from Webkit and the successor to Sunspider. We tested Firefox 42.0 32-bit, Firefox 42.0 64-bit, Firefox Nightly 45.0a1 64-bit and Waterfox 40.1.0, all settings were left at their defaults. The hardware was an AMD Phenom II X4 955 CPU with 4GB of 1333Mhz memory and a 7200RPM HDD. To run the benchmarks each browser was installed on a clean and fully updated Windows 7 Professional SP1 64-bit. For comparison Firefox Nightly 64-bit has also been included to see if test versions are improving in speed and efficiency. We’ve included Waterfox which takes the Firefox source code and compiles it with 64-bit optimizations so it should run more efficiently and faster on 64-bit Windows computers. To find out we’ve put Firefox through a number of well known benchmarks and a few of our own to see what the differences are between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. With this long awaited release, the question now is, does the 64-bit Firefox perform any better than the 32-bit version? Since version 42, Firefox has an official 64-bit version that you can download and install instead of the 32-bit version, although it’s currently not available on the main Firefox download page and is a bit hidden away in the Mozilla release pages. Firefox was the only major browser to not have a 64-bit version, until recently. Internet Explorer has had a 64-bit mode for several years, Chrome also has a version that was released in 2014. A well coded 64-bit application should theoretically perform better and more efficiently than it’s 32-bit counterpart on a 64-bit operating system, usually at the expense of a bit more memory. There’s a lot to like about Firefox with the thousands of available add-ons, but also it’s had it’s fair share of problems with various performance and memory related issues over the years.Īn area where Firefox fell behind is making the browser a full 64-bit application to work better with 64-bit versions of Windows. It used to run Internet Explorer close for top Windows web browser but these days has slipped to distant third behind Internet Explorer and more recently Google Chrome. Mozilla Firefox has been around for over a decade and has built up a huge following of loyal users in that time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |